Talk:Joey Dee and the Starliters

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Pop music

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

JoeyDee123 (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. This user has declared a connection. (declaration)

NPOV cleanup request

I'm not really sure why the Joey Dee/Starliters bio is said to read like an advertisement; I've re-read the article several times and I don't see any red flags. If somebody can enlighten me, I'll be happy to revise the text where necessary. Thank you. Laura Pinto 23:15, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I too don't see anything too amiss here, except there are no sources sited. Statements like "they were such a smash hit . . .", although undoubtedly true, need to be sourced. Wschart 19:10, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Chart peak "Shout"

"Successful singles spawned from Hey, Let's Twist were the title track and "Shout - Part I," which became the group's second-biggest selling record, reaching #8 on the U.S. charts." (version 04 Feb 2011)

Shout_(Isley_Brothers_song) says the cover peaked #6, which can also be found here: http://www.allmusic.com/artist/joey-dee-p69981/charts-awards/billboard-singles

I'll change it for now. Please correct me if anybody knows more. Afghani84 (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Racially integrated group

This needs to be sourced, but my understanding is the Starliters were the first racially integrated group to be a major success. White groups had used black musicians before, and vice versa, but call up the group's 1962 TV performances and it stands out that they had a black backup singer, guitarist (the article states Jimi Hendrix once filled the role) and drummer. You just didn't see that in 1962. If it can be cited, it should be mentioned. 68.146.52.234 (talk) 18:42, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just seen this. FWIW, the Marcels, '61. Rothorpe (talk) 02:11, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Posting a link to a (deleted) comment, with Rothorpe's permission, for future reference: [1] – Corinne (talk) 01:33, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

fwiw, the comment was appended to the page in this diff. --Tagishsimon (talk) 01:58, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Joey Dee and the Starliters

Hello,

I have spent several hours on updating “Joey Dee” and the Starliters.

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Joey_Dee_and_the_Starliters

For some reason, the content that I posted keeps getting deleted. I am the manager and agent for Joey Dee and have full exclusive right to edit Joey Dee biography.

Please advise,

Thank you,

Steve Kulyk User: JoeyDee123

SteveK@JoeyDee.com JoeyDee.com

JoeyDee123 16:44, 11 January 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

Missing member

Why isn’t Felix Cavaliere mentioned, he was a member according to his Wikipedia page. He is also probably the most well known member. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:5540:1500:B5BC:998F:28C9:23D9 (talk) 04:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure? I always thought the most well-known member was Joey... 88.77.167.217 (talk) 23:08, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]