Talk:Joe Tinker

Joe Tinker has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 21, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on May 20, 2013.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that a baseball field and building named after Joe Tinker in Orlando, Florida, are on the United States National Register of Historic Places?

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on July 27, 2019.

Biography: Sports and Games

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Florida Mid‑importance

	Florida portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kansas Low‑importance

	Kansas portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kansas, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Kansas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KansasWikipedia:WikiProject KansasTemplate:WikiProject KansasKansas articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Baseball: Hall of Fame / Cubs / Reds High‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Hall of Fame task force.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Chicago Cubs (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Cincinnati Reds (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Joe Tinker/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 15:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Having previously reviewed Evers, I might as well make the full double play. Comments to follow in the next 1-3 days; thanks as always for your work on these. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:23, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Great. But the "full double play" would also include the third member of Baseball's Sad Lexicon :P – Muboshgu (talk) 15:32, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I snagged 'em both.

-- Khazar2 (talk) 16:00, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, great! Didn't catch that you claimed Chance too. Take your time, no rushies. – Muboshgu (talk) 16:03, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

On first pass, this looks solid and essentially ready for promotion. The sources are good, the writing is good, and the coverage appears comprehensive. Comparison to this suggests no major aspects are left out here. Thanks as always for your work on these.

I made a few tweaks; feel free to revert any you disagree with. Only one small point I couldn't immediately resolve:

"Tinker then batted .263 with as " -- is something missing after with (RBIs)? Or just an extra word? -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:22, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Good catch. That was supposed to be "Tinker then batted. 263 with a home run as", but then I realized that Tinker's 1908 WS home run was the first under the Brush Rules, which have governed every WS since 1905, and so I gave it its own sentence after that, and left an extra word. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:31, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Great--we'll see if we can finish out the double-play with Chance tomorrow, then. Or possibly even tonight, depending on how much the Cards vs. Padres hold my interest... -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:40, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Excellent! You found the needle in the haystack then with my one mistake there. Hope the game is a good one, I might check it out after the Yankees game is over. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:46, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      - Thanks, enjoy yours as well -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:50, 21 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~See minor copyediting point above.~~
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Joe Tinker. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121020104741/http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Joe_Tinker_1880 to http://www.baseballlibrary.com/ballplayers/player.php?name=Joe_Tinker_1880

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:37, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]