Talk:Joe Malone/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 14:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Hello! My name is GhostRiver, and I'll be conducting this GA review. I will assess the article against the good article criteria. Once I complete my review, you will have seven days to implement the suggested edits.
Good Article review progress box
|
Personal life
[edit]- Comma after
During the First World War
- Comma after
After his playing career
- Link "heart attack" to Myocardial infarction
Playing career
[edit]1908–1917
[edit]1917–1924
[edit]Playing style
[edit]Legacy
[edit]- Specify how many goals Richard scored that season
- The "only player to have multiple six-goal games" stat needs a date qualifier. Source is from 2018, so probably "as of 2018"
- When was he inducted into Canada's Sports Hall of Fame?
The statue pays homage to Malone's nickname, "Phantom Joe"
How so?- Per MOS:LQ, ""Phantom Joe."" → ""Phantom Joe"."
Career statistics
[edit]- Good
NHL records
[edit]References
[edit]- There should not be two headings titled "References". Recommend naming the second one "Bibliography".
- When possible, it's helpful to have a link to the Google Books entry for book references
- Rather than saying "See Diamond 2002, p. 610", include a normal endnote citation there instead
General comments
[edit]- No stability concerns, and as the subject has been dead for over 50 years, there are unlikely to be
- Photos are either public domain or CC and are relevant to the article
- Per MOS:CAPTION, unless a caption is a full sentence, there should not be a period at the end of it
- Add "|upright=yes" to the last two photos
- GhostRiver, as the nominator appears to be inactive, if the article does not meet the GA criteria, I would recommend failing this review. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.