Jump to content

Talk:Joe Johnson (snooker player)/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MaxnaCarta (talk · contribs) 05:46, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

General comments

[edit]

Lead

  • Added "The British"
  • Removed hyphen from "quarterfinals"
  • Linked English to England

Early life

  • two commas added
  • Johnson was National to Johnson was the National
  • and three times Yorkshire Champion changed to and a three-time Yorkshire Champion

Early years

  • Capitalised championship
  • Hyphen to 100-break added
  • Removed comma
  • Hyphen to "last-16" added

1982

  • Fixed spelling of opening
  • Johnson recorded 10–0 whitewash changed to Johnson recorded a 10–0 whitewash

Thanks for those, MaxnaCarta. MOS:SNOOKER (yes, there is one!) says that there should be a hyphen in quarter-finals, so am I OK to amend those? BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 10:12, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll put the hyphens back, sorry for that! — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:36, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I've done another copyedit, replacing those hyphens and adding some commas. Advantage was also misspelled so I fixed that. Other than those, this now meets the core criteria for GA and so I will pass. — MaxnaCarta  ( 💬 • 📝 ) 02:41, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Spot Checks

[edit]
  • [20] - I mean, not quite. It does not confirm he was inside the 1983 masters; rather, the reference confirms he was not within the eight-player group. However, this is not a controversial fact. The linked article confirms he was within the 1983 masters, so this is fine.
  • [32a] - Green tickY
  • [32b] - Green tickY
  • [23] - Green tickY
  • [42c] - Green tickY (Impressive, the article used the exact adjective of "attacking", I love this source-text integrity
  • [48a] - Green tickY
  • [52b] - Green tickY
  • [86] - Green tickY
  • [87] - Green tickY


The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.