Talk:Joe Howell
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Joe Howell. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150904024728/http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php to http://www.riaa.com/goldandplatinumdata.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)
Close Connection with Subject
[edit]It looks like whoever placed this tag didn't detail their neutrality concerns (per the linked page: "if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article."). Looking at the history, other writers have taken care of those concerns anyway? I'm not sure this tag is needed anymore. I will work to address the BLP sources tag if I can but I'm not optimistic. FloridaSammi (talk) 14:07, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
A few minutes on a search engine suggests that there's no way to verify these claims. Since there's been a warning that they need verification for years and years and no one's been able I deleted the questionable portions. Let me know if I did wrong. FloridaSammi (talk) 14:18, 22 April 2018 (UTC)