Talk:Jodi Applegate

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pittsburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pittsburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pittsburgh and its metropolitan area on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PittsburghWikipedia:WikiProject PittsburghTemplate:WikiProject PittsburghPittsburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WFXT

She was also on Boston's Fox 25(WFXT) News at Four, then Later on the Fox 25 Morning news. I don't remember the exact dates, which is why I didn't put it in the article. Peter Tangney 20:13, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stub?

Why is this considered a stub? How much information does the world need about Jodi Applegate? --Mbenoit 21:20, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Popular video?

How can a clip be dubbed a popular video on the internet if it just occurred yesterday? Sure, it's piqued a lot of people's interest, but by next week it will be forgotten.

(And her reaction? Definitely over-the-top and unprofessional. What news reporter says "dude?")

In addition, there's definitely some weaseling going on (emphasis mine): "Applegate's angry reaction to what appeared to be a silly stunt struck some as being out of proportion. However, many saw her reaction as fitting and in accord with standards of professionalism and decency in media. The incident became a popular video on the internet." Some? How many people? 1? 50? 1000? Many? How many people? 50 million? 5? How is this video popular? What metric is being used for it? There are no sources for its popularity. This video seems entirely non-notable. The Daily News "source" is also laughable: it's just a personal attack at Jodi Applegate, with no actual newsworthiness. GregChant 03:23, 24 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This can be toned down, I presume that the "national notariety" is not in question -- though I never heard about it, and can't find any news reports on Google besides a no longer free NY Post piece. My head is in the sand news-wise, though. Just watched the video, and some of the weasel words can be stripped out easily. Someone remove the "weasel" template after reviewing my edits, eh? TIA.— David Spalding ^ta!k y@wp/_Contribs 20:05, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speculation?

"She subsequently announced her departure from WPIX after the station refused to allow her to reduce her schedule. Applegate left WPIX on December 19, 2012". Although the author noted a reference the link provided make no mention of her problems with the TV Station. Pirhounix 12:28, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jodi Applegate. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140504222810/http://www.playbill.com/news/article/118122-TV-Anchor-Applegate-Makes-Broadway-Debut-in-Chicago-May-28 to http://www.playbill.com/news/article/118122-TV-Anchor-Applegate-Makes-Broadway-Debut-in-Chicago-May-28

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:53, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]