Jump to content

Talk:Jock Sutherland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

National Championships

[edit]

This article said that Sutherland won five National Championships -- "in 1929, 1931, 1934, 1936 and 1937." Only the last two are widely recognized. After 1936, the National Champion was generally determined by the Associated Press poll. Before that, there were a lot of selectors, but the Unicersity of Pittsburgh was not the consensus champion in 1929, 1931, or 1934. Wiki's entry on NCAA football champions doesn't credit Pitt with titles in those years, so I'm editing that sentence to remove the claim. --Anson2995 14:49, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Widely recognized by who? Who counts? They're recognized by College Football Data Warehouse and listed on the NCAA list of championships. Every single national championship is mythical and one early selector is just as legitimate as any other. Only after the AP and later UPI polls became "established" did they become the "recognized" selectors. In 1936 and 1937, the AP released their final polls prior to bowl game results...so the question is, was the AP the definitive and established selector in 1936 (only the second year of the AP poll and that was after a one year hiatus) like it is now? The answer is No. Did Pitt's 21-0 win over Washington in the Rose Bowl make them more or less of the 1936 National Champ since the AP wouldn't haven considered that game? Whose National Champ in 1936 is more legitimate? The answer is simply personal opinion. I'm adding them back in because, 1) those five dates are actually are widely recognized as noted in A) Sports Illustrated study of 1970 B) College Football Data Warehouse C) NCAA list of champions D) University of Pittsburgh 2) they now appear (and appropriate so) on Wiki's entry on NCAA football champions. I've also added a complete list of every year that one of Sutherland's teams was selected as MNC by any selector because it is thorough and encyclopedic invoking Wikipedia is precise and refrains from any controversial WP:POV. It is up to the individual to decide which are legitimate, because, after all they are all only opinions. Please see Talk:Pittsburgh Panthers for further discussion on the actual championships.CrazyPaco (talk) 02:24, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
You're right, and I think the way you addressed this in the article is great. Anson2995 (talk) 14:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jock Sutherland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:22, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]