This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
It is suggested that reference is made to a definitive ENGLISH publication for references to Radio Caroline, rather than American or Romanian publications, and apparentl claims on their influence on English Pirate stations. A good place to start would be the stations own web site for its origins. This version of events is the same has been published for the past 45 years!
--Keith23:32, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Radio Caroline ceased to exist after the original ships were towed away. What followed were amateurs playing a game of pirate radio. The publications you refer to are academic. The Economist is a noted BRITISH publication. The web site you refer to has no connection whatsoever to any activity that took place between 1964 and 1967. Fk27jh (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 01:25, 29 November 2009 (UTC).[reply]
The Economist and Queen - both respected for providing the views of a particular part of society - hardly impartial!!! --Keith06:53, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Re edit of 2009-11-28T21:32:46 and the current (2009-12-03T21:38:08)
Stevens is credited here as a newspaper publisher and Quango member. All of the facts stated on the current version are uncontested. However, to elaborate on a small section of his life with material that is at odds to referenceable material, quoting material which is irrelevant is tantamount to trying to rewrite history. Elaborating further, in the so called "references" on the socio-political references of that material, is totally beyond the scope of this article. To then use this article as a reference for such material is nothing more than reprehensible. Hence the removal of such, which has been done as to keep as much verifiable material as possible. --Keith09:38, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
