Talk:Jo Ann Emerson

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

U.S. Congress Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is about one (or many) person(s).

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Ohio / Ohio Wesleyan University Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio Wesleyan University (assessed as Low-importance).

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Self-reflection

I removed this recently added pargraph:

On the weekend of January 20, 2006, Emerson and her husband Ronald Gladney took a two-day trip to Santa Barbara, California for the purpose of "spiritual self-reflection." Expenses ($1,108.70) for the trip were paid by the Fetzer Institute, based in Michigan. In a travel disclosure form, Emerson wrote that the purpose of the trip was "A time for spiritual self-reflection and an open and honest dialogue."

This text provided no information regarding what the point of the pargraph is. Has some sort improper activity been alleged? Is it trying to say that she is a spirtual person? Should we be concerned about involvement with the Feltzer institute (whoever that is)? Overall -- what is the relevance of this paragraph? Could whoever added this or someone that has information regarding this, please determine what the relevance of this to the article is. If it is relevant please modify the text to make that apparent and restore it to the article. kenj0418 22:03, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Obscene Letter

this is mildly amusing, but probably not significant enough to include. just leaving it for reference in case anything ever becomes of it campaignwise. Derex 06:39, 20 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the most recent deletion of information by an anonymous user concerning the letter containing an obscenity sent out by Emerson's office. Contrary to the anonymous user's opinion, I do not believe such information is "worthless", considering how unusual such an occurrence is. --TommyBoy 23:16, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The information was deleted again this morning. I have re-added it for the time being because it is properly sourced and the incident seems to be reasonably notable (having been reported by The Guardian). I am not saying that it definitely should be in the article but can this please be properly discussed and a consensus reached (ideally with reason based upon established policy/guidelines) before it is removed again. If it is removed again, a clear justification in the edit summary would help. Thanks TigerShark 18:47, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Considering that it has been three years since this controversy developed, without any further edits relevant to the "obscene letter", I think an update on the situation or a re-assessment of its continued inclusion in the article is certainly in order. --TommyBoy (talk) 03:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, the info has once again been deleted and since it has been almost five years since the issue originated, and nearly eighteen months since I previously suggested that an update on the situation was needed without further comment from other users, I think it is best to drop the subject. --TommyBoy (talk) 05:30, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of messages from this page

Please do not remove messages from this page - such an action may be considered vandalism. Thanks TigerShark 18:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CEO of NRECA

Ms. Emerson is no longer in Congress; she is the CEO of the National Rural Electric Cooperative Association (NRECA).Hickory19 (talk) 10:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jo Ann Emerson. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130406092920/http://www.standard-democrat.com/story/1350362.html to http://www.standard-democrat.com/story/1350362.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:02, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]