Talk:Jim Whittington

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Christianity

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

There are no references in this article. I took a few minutes to move things around and delete some of the repeated statements (which shouldn't have been a problem in the first place, in an article that runs just a few paragraphs.) Found the article on a search for "wheelchair-bound", a term I just abhor. Photomikey 23:25, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Weak sourcing

This article has very weak sourcing. I've moved the closest thing to a source from an external link to a footnote. But the source is an aside in an article about something else, and it backs only the bare fact of the year, charge and conviction.

Should this be deleted? David in DC (talk) 18:28, 28 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]