Talk:Jilly Juice

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2024. The result of the discussion was keep.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Autism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Autism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of all aspects of autism and autistic culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutismWikipedia:WikiProject AutismTemplate:WikiProject AutismAutism
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative views Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative viewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative viewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative viewsAlternative views
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Alternative medicine

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Their edits to this article were last checked for neutrality on 30-04-2020.

Maithijilly (talk · contribs) This user has contributed to the article. ([1] [2] [3] [4])

Major COI Issue

I have noted that the creator of Jilly Juice has released a YouTube video in which she admits to editing this article. There are major issues with this that I shouldn't have to explain, especially as this is a pseudo-scientific subject. She uses the account Maithijilly. I have sent a level 4 for the deliberate addition of misleading content, even following the conflic of intrest notifications. Please discuss this matter here.

"wikipedia is a live document and I was trying to actually do corrections on it last night obviously obviously I'm biased conflict of interest myself or any of you that have a comp but that I have an investment in Julie juice I mean you could probably go and change things around a little bit so it doesn't look like it's completely talking out of its ass but you know if you do if you are somehow I mean I'm not paying anybody to do that but it has to be very organic and has to be from a some of this not at is how many investment in J juice in any way shape or form so I always you know so the the moderators were moderating my Corrections and they're like you have a conflict of interest um you need to chill out so I made the thing I think I saw one change stuck which was the white salt not the pink Himalayan salt but I was trying to add in my two cents in different places on it last night and it stuck for a minute and then the the moderators are like okay no you can't do this so I get it I mean I'm gonna have to wait for somebody else to filter their perceptions of J juice um through them and then they write it as an independent contributor with absolutely no biases and I mean I didn't see too many biases I mean it still sucks to see them recounting just asinine things..." - from transcript of this YouTube video

JamesHSmith6789 (talk) 17:47, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there was no question, the user was claiming to be Jillian Mai Thi Epperly, even if the user has yet to formally disclose the conflict of interest. Earlier edit summaries: "Corrupted gross mischaracterization that I've claimed any cures", " I've never claimed cures" and "I have been falsely mischaracterized by these articles" and the user name Maithijilly made that clear.. Since the above was posted the user has indirectly confirmed her identity on her talk page by mentioning her belief that the article is written about her. I will add a connected contributor template since the user has been asked more than once to so so but has not. Meters (talk) 01:34, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]