Talk:Jessica Mulroney

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jessica Mulroney. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160320040249/http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=7bac6916-54dd-4a4b-ad81-c9bb97e020b3 to http://www.canada.com/story.html?id=7bac6916-54dd-4a4b-ad81-c9bb97e020b3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:03, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

linkectomy

I reverted a linkectomy. I think policy did not support the linkectomy. Redlinks should only be removed when it is unlikely the topic could support an article, which is not the case here. Plus redlinks are useful, for finding other articles that link to the topic, an early step in creating an article. Geo Swan (talk) 01:07, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

informationectomy

I reverted an informationectomy. Her work for the daughter in law of her father-in-law's rival did stir comment.

In this edit a contributor removed coverage of her friendship with Meghan Markle, with the edit summary "I've got mates too. Doesn't belong on WP, though." Surely that is not the right test? Yes, we all have friends. And surely, if reliable sources discuss our friendships, that makes those friendships something potentially belonging on the wikipedia? Geo Swan (talk) 01:20, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]