Talk:Jessica Kingsley Publishers
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 28 June 2023. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This page was proposed for deletion by Buidhe (talk · contribs) on 9 September 2020. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jessica Kingsley Publishers article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Notability
[edit]This publisher has questionable notability as a topic for a stand-alone article.
It was created by an SPA during their brief presence in 2006, and I don't see the topic as passing the WP:GNG, or the specific guideline for companies and organizations. This should probably be deleted. Mathglot (talk) 21:00, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- I am not familiar with the concept of something losing notability here. If the article once passed notability, shouldn't that hold value and precedence? How does one loose notability? PigeonChickenFish (talk) 16:49, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:38, 1 February 2022 (UTC)