Jump to content

Talk:Jessica Hardy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleJessica Hardy was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 17, 2010Good article nomineeNot listed
October 3, 2010Good article nomineeListed
March 19, 2023Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on March 12, 2017, and March 12, 2023.
Current status: Delisted good article

Relevance of half life

[edit]

I'm not sure the half-life section is relevant - there were five days between the two negatives, which could be enough time to explain a positive in the middle according to this information. (I've also seen the half life described as 34 rather than 36.)Random name (talk) 12:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editorial?

[edit]

I'm wondering about a few lines in the drug results section of this article. In particular; "It has been noted that the positive test was sandwiched by two negative tests, each within a few days of the positive result." This is included with no further details; it seems to imply but not actually say that the results are in question. This should probably either be removed, or expanded to actually say the results were questioned with relevant cites, etc. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Random name (talkcontribs) 10:01, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, that statement does seem a little weird. I've removed that sentence unless someone can provide further reference.Philipmj24 (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Jessica Hardy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Jessica Hardy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:38, 9 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Jessica Hardy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:16, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: Issues unresolved, no active work; delist. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 00:21, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seems wrong to immediately nominate this for GAR while it's on OTD but I have a problem with the article. Mainly, the article has not been updated at all. The article just ends at 2015 even though it's 2023 and a quick search shows that there's probably at least something mention post 2015. Also the personal bests table looks uncited. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:07, 12 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.