Talk:Jessica Feshbach/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AGK [•] 14:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Concisely written and clear.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Meets WP:V; no obvious factual errors or content of questionable accuracy.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Covers all aspects of the subject matter.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Satisfies WP:NPOV.

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   No ongoing edit wars or substantial expansion of the article.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No images used, but none appear to be available.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Happy to give this article GA status. AGK [•] 14:26, 30 January 2011 (UTC)