Jump to content

Talk:Jesse L. Brown/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk · contribs) 14:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    Don't capitalize naval unless it's a proper noun.
    Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 19:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Don't you mean "his"? the schools closer to this family were lower-quality
    Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 19:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
    Title capitalization in Ecker needs to be fixed. And DMY.
    Fixed. —Ed!(talk)
    Actually, your changes here made it worse. The major words of the subtitle need to be capitalized. And fix the spelling of casualties. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(capital_letters)#Composition_titles.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 14:49, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    I fixed it as far as I am aware of the policy (capitalized the beginning of each phrase and the proper nouns. If this isn't the correct format I don't know what is. —Ed!(talk) 00:20, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    You should have used Smith as your model; every significant word is capitalized, plus the first word. I did it for you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 01:33, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    How could his enlistment end on 15 April and he remain in the Navy?
    Fixed. —Ed!(talk) 19:07, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    Fixed everything. Thanks for your review! —Ed!(talk) 19:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]