Talk:Jeremy Keith
Appearance
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Jeremy.Keith
[edit]If Jeremy.Keith is actually Jeremy Keith, perhaps he should leave it to other people to edit this page.
Oh my
[edit]I've removed pretty much everything from this article. It's all unsourced, irrelevant, possibly copyright violating rubbish. We should start again Alex Muller 16:01, 3 February 2011 (UTC)
- There were many problems with the article as it was, but you removed copious amounts of appropriate content. Read WP:PRESERVE and give it another try.--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 08:33, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree. The entire article had one reference, which actually isn't available. There's numerous mentions of Mr Keith committing illegal activity, which may or may not be true. I could go through and add a citation needed to every sentence, but that's ridiculous. We need to start again Alex Muller 23:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)
- I would like to nominate this wiki for deletion or at least title modification. When my name is googled, this wiki appears and has poor connotations associated with it. The other factor for consideration is that the gentleman has two middle names (Phillip Charles) included in the notation of his names. I would feel it more befitting if at the very least his middle names were also included in the wiki title to avoid confusion. Jeremy B. Keith (talk) 05:06, 21 May 2015 (UTC)
- I respectfully disagree. The entire article had one reference, which actually isn't available. There's numerous mentions of Mr Keith committing illegal activity, which may or may not be true. I could go through and add a citation needed to every sentence, but that's ridiculous. We need to start again Alex Muller 23:19, 20 March 2011 (UTC)