Jump to content

Talk:Jenny Shimizu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject class rating

[edit]

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 17:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Original name

[edit]

What is her name in Japanese language? Newone (talk) 07:45, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She is an american, born in the USA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.64.173.11 (talk) 02:51, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tat

[edit]

She's a model. Her short hair and unusual tattoo are relevant. A tattoo website is a reliable source for the appearance of her tattoo. Is this really libelous? 16:04, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

The link to the tattoo site does not go directly to nude photo. I didn't realize myself that the pic clicked through. Based on this ref, it's clear that the tattoo exists. Please do not tag it as unreferenced. Let's agree to stop this edit warring. 16:16, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

I note to my dismay that we seem to have two articles on the same individual, and both seem to contain well-referenced material that differs in emphasis. I don't think this is a situation where I simply turn one into a redirect to the other -- there seems to be valuable content in both. I'm not quite sure what to do here and have asked for assistance from a colleague, but anyone watching this page would be welcome to comment. Accounting4Taste:talk 23:24, 30 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the new article is that well-referenced -- on close examination, there seems to be quite a bit of blog sourcing, "references" to dummy pages, and highly promotional junk. In fact, it looks to me like an expanded version of text that an SPA claiming to be acting on behalf of the subject's management tried to add to this article last summer, raising COI issues as well. I've redirected the new article here; any salvageable content can be added back in, but the referencing needs careful checking, especially to ensure the sources are independent. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:22, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
My impression of the well-referenced nature of the new article turns out to have been not so well founded. Thanks to everyone who took on the task of assessing this and making decisions. Accounting4Taste:talk 17:53, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BLP sources flag removed

[edit]

This article seems to have references for each claim, so I have removed the BLP sources template. WikkanWitch (talk) 16:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jenny Shimizu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]