Talk:Jenica Atwin

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jenica Atwin article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

This page is about a politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. For that reason, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Green Politics (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Green Politics, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Green PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject Green PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Green PoliticsGreen Politics

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Canada: New Brunswick / Politics Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject New Brunswick.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Political parties and politicians in Canada.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women

Crossing the floor

I've reverted the information about her crossinng the floor for now. While it seems likely to occur based on the sources, it has not (as of this post) yet officially happened. Ckatz^talk 17:02, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The official announcement may be occuring shortly as CBC's site appears to be standing by on a live feed with Liberal MP Dominic LeBlanc. Ckatz^talk 17:08, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wolastoq

This article mentions "Ron Tremblay, the Wolastoq Grand Chief". The redirect of the link to Wolastoq or a possible alternative term has recently been discussed on Talk:Wolastoq#Article_name. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 20:25, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

IP's preferred addition

I invite IP 99.106.93.88 to discuss their preferred addition here and gain consensus by persuading other editors rather than continuing to edit war. Thanks, Generalrelative (talk) 00:52, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a preferred addition. Half of a quote was cut off due to the reference used cutting it in half. I added the full quote but forgot to add the reference for it, several particularly slow people reverted it, I realized my mistake and added the reference. It is not language, it is accuracy. 99.106.93.88 (talk) 00:53, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

By several particularly slow people are you referring to ClueBot, Paul Erik, Glane23 and me? And you think that name calling is going to be an effective way to persuade us that you were right all along (that is, those three of us who are not an anti-vandalism bot)? Since you may not yet be aware, I will inform you that WP:CIVILITY is required of those who wish to edit Wikipedia. It is not optional. Generalrelative (talk) 00:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you are also at 4 reverts in the past 24 hours, in clear violation of WP:3RR. Please pay careful attention to our policy forbidding edit warring in the future. You may find it helpful to read WP:1AM as well. Generalrelative (talk) 01:01, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I see no need to persuade (edit: Also, persuade you about what? I am adding the second half of a quote that was cut off due to a poor reference used, what exactly do you need to be persuaded on?) you that I was right all along, the reference I added does that for me. As for civility, you removed my completion of the quote with zero comment on the reversion. You reverted it AFTER I explained what the change was. Again with zero comment. Would you care to explain this? 99.106.93.88 (talk) 01:10, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will at the very least need to persuade me or someone else here that your preferred addition is WP:DUE. I am not convinced that it does not represent WP:SENSATION. It certainly looks to be, even judging simply on the basis of its use of multiple exclamation points, which do not typically appear in encyclopedia articles. But in terms of content too, I am dubious that this remark would be seen by the community to satisfy WP:10YEARTEST. Generalrelative (talk) 01:41, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

They were part of the full quote, but if you want to remove the extra exclamation points feel free. The quote should still be included. 99.106.93.88 (talk) 23:59, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]