Jump to content

Talk:Jeff Leach (politician)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jeff Leach (politician). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:27, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Removed NPOV section and cleaned BLP language

[edit]

This page was one of a few that had been edited with non-neutral language to insert a "Notable Votes" section, seemingly for the sole purpose of introducing material about a controversial 2023 vote against Ken Paxton -- while not including any other relevant material about the legislator's record.

I also removed the "overly resume-like" verbiage regarding honors and recognitions, especially since most were uncited. TXLegeWonk (talk) 22:27, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Swatjester per this edit, I have the same issue that I had with same user on this edit. It's an issue of NPOV as to proportion, IMO, and it has happened from same user on several similar contentious pages.
As I said on a similar page, when there is a BLP on a sitting elected official -- one who has taken dozens of positions on hundreds of bills over 10+ years, and been quoted in the media 100 times on different topics, and run in a dozen contested elections -- and an editor cherry-picks one isolated vote or one long-ago opponent or one isolated quote to insert, with no other relevant material to expand the page, I think it's an NPOV issue even if the source is reliable. TXLegeWonk (talk) 18:44, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
This edit for example... Under the ostensible banner of "cleaning up promotional/biased language," the user removed actual legislation list, facts on committee appointments, other RS content... and inserted one contentious media interaction and one contentious vote. Why not just remove the bias from the original material? TXLegeWonk (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]