This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Olympics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Olympics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OlympicsWikipedia:WikiProject OlympicsTemplate:WikiProject OlympicsOlympics
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Boxing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Boxing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BoxingWikipedia:WikiProject BoxingTemplate:WikiProject BoxingBoxing
Jeff Horn is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
There seems to be a fight listed for March 2016, which has now passed and no result posted. Was this fight due to take place or is it an error?
The fight was postponed due to Jeff Horn suffering an injury in training, and no one updated the article. The fight will subsequently be taking place in an hour and 20 minutes from now as I write this. I may enter result details at a later stage, once the fight has taken place. 110.140.193.164 (talk) 07:41, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is it acceptable to emphasise the loaded term "controversial" in the lead of this article? Sources or otherwise (and not all outlets/personalities have deemed it controversial), it smacks of POV to me and borders on violating WP:BLPSTYLE. User:Ohio girl insists (without edit summaries) that "controversial" be present, and she has reverted other users too, so I guess she's not in a collaborative mood yet. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 21:22, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The word "controversial" is not loaded nor is it POV or partisan, it is merely the word used by the vast majority of reliable sources to describe the event. The bout and its decision undoubtedly caused considerable controversy; it would be suspicious to conceal this fact. Ohio girl (talk) 23:33, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ohio girl's edits are troll attempts. Almost every edit is a anti-white/pro-asian edit from her. Deal with her edits in the same way that you would deal with any other trolling. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 09:50, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You are clearly unhinged if you are playing the race card this quickly. I recommend you seek help and take a break from editing. Ohio girl (talk) 09:59, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
You don't get to play innocent when you wildly accuse someone of being racist just because they make edits you don't like. Ohio girl (talk) 10:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please. You called me a troll and then claimed that I have a racial agenda (which ironically only served to expose your own racial agenda). Your comments have been nothing but baseless personal attacks. Ohio girl (talk) 10:15, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Enough. I have explained that I attacked your edits, not you. If you can't/won't understand that, then we have nothing more to talk about on that subject. See ya. Spacecowboy420 (talk) 10:22, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Anyway, the word "controversial" has been removed from the article. It is still visible in the names of a couple of the sources. HiLo48 (talk) 06:40, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=logo}
