Talk:Jeepers Creepers (2001 film)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Lirim.Z (talk · contribs) 10:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Reviewing this later today — Lirim | Talk 10:16, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Infobox and lead
[edit]- Picture in the infobox needs an alt text (WP:MOSALT)
- Fair use rationale is good
- Infobox looks good
Plot, cast
[edit]- No issues
Production
[edit]Development and writing
[edit]- Picture needs alt
- I would change the order of the refs, so it's [14][16]
Pre-production
[edit]- Well written, but the entire section is based on one single source, would it be possible to add a second or third one?
- That's about all I could find for those topics. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Casting
[edit]- Hollywood.com should be in italics
Filming and design
[edit]- Picture needs alt
Music
[edit]- Cover needs alt
- AllMusic's genres should be avoided (WP:A/S; WP:ALLMUSIC), a single AllMusic source doesn't really cut it
Done Removed. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:20, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Infobox is good
- Please use Template:Non-free use rationale album cover for the album cover
Release
[edit]Theatrical
[edit]- No issues
Home Media
[edit]- Behind the Peepers - The Making of Jeepers Creepers -> – en-dash
Reception
[edit]Box office
[edit]- "Labor Day opening weekend four-day gross previously held by the 2006 film The Crow: City of Angels ($9.8 million)." -> 1996
- "By the end of its run in the United States and Canada, the film grossed $37.9 million" -> By the end of its run in/on Month/Year in the United States...
Critical response
[edit]- "compared it positively to Scream." -> add (1996) after Scream
- "acting work" is a weird term, "acting" would be better
Accolades
[edit]- No issues
Sequels
[edit]- No issues
References
[edit]- It's lastname, firstname for all refs
- Ref 20: website=Hollywood.com
- Ref 29: No need for the out, Shout quickly/Scream quickly is a better translation
- Ref 33, 36, 37, 43, 46: en-dashes (–)
- Ref 40, 56, 69, 78: MOS:Caps
- Ref 50: Link Metacritic
- The "cite Metacritic" template isn't linking it. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:06, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
Notes
[edit]- I would change the order of the refs, so it's [9][24]
Outcome
[edit]On hold Great article, a few minor things but nothing that would take days to fix, I'll grant you 7 days.--Lirim | Talk 12:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: I have responded / addressed all of your suggestions. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- The picture under Filming and design still needs an alt description.--Lirim | Talk 14:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: I added the "alt" parameter and a description. Does it not appear? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Fixed it. Happy to pass this article now. — Lirim | Talk 15:06, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: I added the "alt" parameter and a description. Does it not appear? Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- The picture under Filming and design still needs an alt description.--Lirim | Talk 14:51, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Lirim.Z: I have responded / addressed all of your suggestions. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.