Jump to content

Talk:Jeans (film)/GA3

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 02:40, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    Very poor prose throughout. Please get assistance to copy-edit and rewrite the article in good, clear English, paying attention to to grammar, spelling, style, clarity and readability.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    I fixed four disambiguation links, please check that the correct targets were found.[1]
    I tagged one dead link
    BB reviews at [[2] is not a reliable source
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    The article seems a little thin, but perhaps there is no ore to be said about this film.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    This article needs completely rewriting to comply with the criteria of "reasonably good prose" which it is a long way away from at present. THere are outstanding dead links and one dubious source. Thus, I will not not be listing it at this time. Please read and understand the criteria at WP:GA?.–– Jezhotwells (talk) 03:02, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]