Jump to content

Talk:Jean Hill

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The Lady in Red"

[edit]

"The Lady in Red" page deserves a cross-reference to this article. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.170.159.234 (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

I've corrected a couple of things. The "lambchop" thing is a factoid, based on looking at a very poor resolution photo of the mums. Also, I've added her most explosive (and most discrediting) claim, to have actually seen a grassy knoll shooter. This in fact flatly contradicts her early testimony. I hope I got the reference in the right place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmcadams1968 (talkcontribs) 21:57, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jean Hill. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the bot's edit and removed the material cited to the link. The link does not mention Hill at all, and it appears to have been inserted to show that a majority of people, like Hill, believed their was a conspiracy to assassinate Kennedy. We don't need to go into a discussion of how someone's opinion agrees with or differs from the mainstream unless reliable secondary sources specifically address that issue. -Location (talk) 13:21, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]