Talk:Jean-Joseph Ange d'Hautpoul

Jean-Joseph Ange d'Hautpoul has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
April 2, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed

Military history: Biography / European / French / Early Modern / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jean-Joseph Ange d'Hautpoul/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Jean-Joseph Ange d'Hautpoul

I checked for problems with external links and references but did not find any. I also ran the article through AWB and found a couple of minor issues which I fixed, I hope you don't mind.

There is one disambiguous link for Eylau
I think the lead should be expanded a little. Its currently very short and doesn't summerize the article
Since this is a person I think that the persondata template should be added.
There is a broken citation in the revolutionary wars section.
reference 9 in the references is broken. Not sure if this is related to the citation problem above.

Other than these few things it looks good to me. --Kumioko (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC) Reviewer: Kumioko (talk) 20:53, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- thanks for reading. I think I've fixed the points you're raised. I've not found a broken link. Auntieruth55 (talk) 22:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - All items are fixed so I promoted the article, good job. --Kumioko (talk) 01:56, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - thank you! And thanks for the review. Always good to have another pair of eyes~ Auntieruth55 (talk) 02:29, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jean-Joseph Ange d'Hautpoul. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:36, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]