Talk:Jean-Charles de Borda

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Military / Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the military biography work group.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Physics: Biographies Mid‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Military history: Biography / Maritime / European / French / Early Modern / American Revolution / Napoleonic era

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Untitled

After adding one word, the page saved as a very strange text and html combination. Never have seen anything like this before. I don't know what to do to have this corrected.--Fahrenheit451 23:45, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

There was a funny invisible character after the infobox. I saw it when turning wikEd on, and removed it. Hope this helps. Crowsnest (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Napoléon's Method?

Is there a citation for this claim or a clarification of what Napoléon's method was (and how it differed from Borda's)? "In 1770, Borda formulated a ranked preferential voting system that is referred to as the Borda count. The French Academy of Sciences used Borda's method to elect its members for about two decades until it was quashed by Napoleon Bonaparte who insisted that his own method be used after he became president of the Académie in 1801." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.47.69.23 (talk) 01:28, 26 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible Inaccuracy

It says under the section, Tables of Logarithms:

"With the advent of the metric system after the French Revolution it was decided that the quarter circle should be divided into 100 degrees instead of 90 degrees, and the degree into 100 seconds instead of 60 seconds."

Then beneath it in the same section:

"...the Quarter of the Circle divided into 100 degrees, the degree into 100 minutes, and the minute into 100 seconds..."

The first says from degrees to seconds; the second says from degrees to minutes to seconds. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.153.48.149 (talk) 05:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Political science ?

I see no reason to qualify Borda as a "political scientist". It is true that the so-called Borda count is an election method, but it is a very small thing in his life, and he himself apparently did not relate this suggestion to political matters. Reading the (very detailled and lengthy !) book on his life, one can see that the Borda rule was defined by an enginner, not by a political scientist! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Girifou (talk • contribs) 13:31, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]