Talk:Jay Rock discography
![]() | This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Guest appearances proposal
[edit]The other information on the page is already organized into a table. Thus, it looks a little strange that when you get to the guest appearances, the information appears in the form of a plain text list. The amount of data there doesn't necessarily require it at the moment, however I've proposing that we go ahead and organize it into a table. The artist has yet to make multiple appearances on an album (to my knowledge, and based on the information present) but when that occurs, a table would make it easier to group the information. Being signed to Strange Music, I also suspect that he may begin having multiple appearances on albums. Whether that happens or not, it's only speculation at this point. Anyway, I was thinking of doing something similar to what I've done over at the Tech N9ne discography and have just done on the Big Scoob page. It would appear as:
Extended content
| |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Just thought I would throw it together and toss it up here and see what others thoughts are on the matter. Thoughts? Also, while they have been designated as singles and are listed in their own subsection, should the "featured singles" not appear in the list of "guest appearances," as they are still guest appearances and leaves that section looking incomplete. – Mizery Made (talk · contribs) 20:12, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm gonna go ahead and change it to table format which would be the best. It would be irrelavent to mention featured singles as guest appearences are songs hes been featured on that haven't been released as singles. STATic message me! 20:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
- I'm glad to see you agree on the table issue. On the other however, I still maintain the position that regardless if a song was released as a single, it's still a "Guest appearance" and should appear as such as well. Have a look at the Eminem discography, which is a featured list. It too has separate sections for singles (labeled "Guest appearances", though I feel what's used here is more appropriate) and collaborations/appearances (labeled "Collaborations"). Those appearing in the Singles table also appear in the list of collaborations on that article. – Mizery Made (talk · contribs) 04:02, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Jay Rock discography. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101115082104/http://blog.jayrock.com/jay-rock-featured-in-xzibits-ugly-song/ to http://blog.jayrock.com/jay-rock-featured-in-xzibits-ugly-song/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101122105825/http://www.yoraps.com/audios1.php?subaction=showfull&id=1290166269&archive=&start_from=&ucat=13& to http://www.yoraps.com/audios1.php?subaction=showfull&id=1290166269&archive=&start_from=&ucat=13&
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120315191556/http://blog.jayrock.com/nina-b-featuring-jay-rock-poppin-song/ to http://blog.jayrock.com/nina-b-featuring-jay-rock-poppin-song/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:00, 20 April 2017 (UTC)