This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion
Currently this article is being vandalized by many editors. The controversy surrounding Javed Habib spitting on a woman's head has triggered this row of vandalism. Senior editors should keep a vigilant watch on this article for at least the next few weeks. Thank you Charvak157 (talk) 03:05, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
No explanation has been provided for this revert even after multiple discussions[1][2] so far. The edit added the template which claims that the person is not notable and that is beyond WP:DE. Other than that it removed "He later apologised for the act" and added back the misrepresentation that "He also claimed ‘This spit has life'" which is being presented as if he justified his act with that 'claim' when confronted. The objected edit also moves the controversy to the lead despite it has no effect on his career. Per WP:UNDUE and WP:NPOV this edit should be reverted. AnM2002 (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done. DMySon, you're really expected to offer more. Please be responsive / substantive. Your terse declarative reply above falls short. El_C15:13, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]