This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Netherlands, an attempt to create, expand, and improve articles related to the Netherlands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.NetherlandsWikipedia:WikiProject NetherlandsTemplate:WikiProject NetherlandsNetherlands articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
A very nice start, but not quite long enough to warrant B-class in my opinion. In point of fact, it even has a whole bunch of stub tags on it. Expansion is needed, if possible. LordAmeth21:11, 14 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Who is Prince Magelang? Is he another name of Prince Diponegoro? I added {{contradict}} because the number of casualties in the infobox contradicts with the number in the texts. Peace. --Nielswik(talk)05:04, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
re the contradiction tags, I've now reconciled the article and the info box - the problem now being that the ranges are unreferenced and so wide as to be essentially useless - we need some reliable sources. Merbabu13:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
