Talk:Jatt & Juliet 2

This article was nominated for deletion on 14 May 2013. The result of the discussion was redirect to Jatt & Juliet#Sequel.

Film: Indian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

AFD Discussion

The AFd happened on 14th May, and the closing comments read - "Given the amount of coverage the first film received, it's likely that this film will gain coverage enough to merit its own article at some point in time. Likely, but not guaranteed. I think that for right now it's enough to just redirect to the main article for the first film, where there's a section for any sequel news. The biggie here is that until we have that coverage, we can't justify it having a separate article" Here is the coverage for this film :- http://www.google.co.in/#safe=off&sclient=psy-ab&q=JAtt+and+juliet+2+10+day+collection&oq=JAtt+and+juliet+2+10+day+collection&gs_l=hp.3...118323.124004.3.124443.17.17.0.0.0.0.221.3051.0j15j2.17.0...0.0.0..1c.1.17.psy-ab.fn5hhu3Fapk&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.48705608,d.bmk&fp=454708d46e718598&biw=1366&bih=635 It merits an article, and actually did so even earlier as all Hollywood sequels in production get an article before the movie gets released. Injun Gone Loco (talk) 21:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The version you restored is the one that was redirected in May - the one with no evidence of notability, no references, etc. I'd suggest putting a draft together that incorporates your source (and, hopefully, others) and shows clearly that the article meets our criteria. Then we overturn the redirect - not before. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 00:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've recreated the page with some sources, so I feel that we should have a new discussion based upon what I've found. I have a very strong feeling that there are more sources in Punjabi or another language, though. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:42, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Despite their choice to create a speedy sequel film just one year after the original Jatt & Juliet released (likely to benefit from the original's popularity... and Bollywood does have a reputation for cranking out films in record time). This "sequel" has the requisite coverage and is not simply a recreation of the original 2012 film. As the article currently stands (thanks to Tokyogirl79), we have a released film that meets WP:NF for a separate article. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 06:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jatt & Juliet 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:44, 19 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jatt & Juliet 2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150924083315/http://www.punjabiportal.com/articles/jatt-juliet-2-released-in-pakistan to http://www.punjabiportal.com/articles/jatt-juliet-2-released-in-pakistan

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:37, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]