Hello lullabying, I'll take up the review for this nomination and present it to you, shortly. I hope you will find my feedback to be useful and that I will learn something new in the process. Tayi ArajakateTalk06:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Lullabying, I have completed the review and it appears to be to meet the good article criteria on nomination. I couldn't find any significant issues so I'm going to promote it, though I have left some comments below, mostly suggestions. Excellent work on the article and congratulations on your successful nomination! Tayi ArajakateTalk21:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest bundling citations when a line needs a lot of citations (3+). There are a lot of these cases in the article.
Suggest renaming the section on sub-categories to "sub-category markets" otherwise it gives an impression that it is a section on "types" encompasses all idols and without overlaps. The section should also come somewhere after "History", generally articles tend to have "Definition" or an equivalent followed by "History".
The sources listed in the "Sources" section don't appear to be used in the article itself? They should be incorporated into the article if they aren't, and if they already are, they need to be present as in-line citations.
Pass