The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
A news item involving Japan–Korea disputes was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the In the news section on 30 December 2015.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project, participate in relevant discussions, and see lists of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 17:00, December 19, 2024 (JST, Reiwa 6) (Refresh)JapanWikipedia:WikiProject JapanTemplate:WikiProject JapanJapan-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia
User:STSC, normally, in recounting historical events, the events are told in chronological order. I don't know what is desired for this paragraph, but with this recent edit, the events are now out of chronological order. Before, they were closer to chronological order. Also, the word "the" is needed before "Korean government". Corinne (talk) 14:46, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
By all means, put it in chronological order; before my edit it just sounded like the Japanese who paid out all the money to the victims. STSC (talk) 16:50, 3 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I thought adding the life and impact of the Japanese colonization on Korea was relevant to the topic. Please feel free to edit or add. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbrby (talk • contribs) 17:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I think its more constructive if the article was organized on a timeline basis, beginning with the Basic Treaty on normalization. The reason so being is that this is the enabling law that is supposed to govern diplomatic relations. A timeline is appropriate now since Japan-Korea disputes have been in the news quite frequently given disputes over the 2018 Korean Supreme Court ruling and its diplomatic fallout.
The source for the Dokdo guards stationed on Dokdo was unreliable. So the source was changed to an official website describing what the Dokdo Guard was doing. GeonwooLee (talk) 08:10, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
