This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2020. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland
Hi, User:Montanabw this image is copyrighted – it is dragged off the RHA announcement – and if the image is fair use, it certainly isn't clear. Please support the claim and see [[1]]. This is in keeping with best wikipedia practice. Further the citations I removed are redundant, excessively so [[2]], and not in the sentence or even paragraph they are referring too. I – and no doubt others – will be working on this page to improve it over the next weeks, I am certain everything possible to attain the best possible encyclopedic entry will be used. Reverting, let's keep further conversation on these matters here to prevent a back and forth Hesperian Nguyen (talk)
There is a fair use rationale at the image’s file. Anyone deceased for whom a free use image cannot be found is fair use with the appropriate tag at the image. Go look at that file. Montanabw(talk)15:28, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Also, when you move around refs, keep the names on named refs to avoid making the same citation appear to be multiple citations. I fixed all your mistakes in a step by step fashion, if you wish to study the article history to see the process. Montanabw(talk)15:51, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, yes- the image was uploaded using Wikipedia:File Upload Wizard which helps ensure the tags on the image are correct and that the fair use has been correctly applied. If you have a free image then by all means please do upload that to commons and replace this one. ☕ Antiqueightchatter15:57, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help on the citations. I will adopt this in the future. However, it was another issue I was referring to, in which the original new page had all of its citations 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9, etc.. together below the 3 paragraphs. It's resolved now so no worries.
I'll dig a little deeper with the images of dead persons, as frankly I don't think that is a particularly good one! Hesperian Nguyen (talk)
