Talk:Jane Withers/GA1
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 12:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- *"Wojcik opines that this introduced the narrative of queerness through alternative family structures"
- Who is Wojcik, and why are they quoted here? No Wikipedia article on this person, and If this mention is left, reader needs some clue who this is.
- *"Withers was allowed to go on chaperoned dates with groups of same-age boys in her early teens"
- Needs tweaking - this sounds like it was just Withers and an entire group boys on a singular date. The source says "with half a dozen or so boys of her age" - I think that meant her available dates to chose from, not being with all of them at once.
- *"imprint her handprints"
- Sort of repetitive. Maybe "place her handprints"
Done Fixes made. I thought it was Wikipedia style to just use the last name of an author, but I added in her name and the book title. Yoninah (talk) 15:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sort of repetitive. Maybe "place her handprints"
- *"Wojcik opines that this introduced the narrative of queerness through alternative family structures"
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it neutral?
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Per This talk page conversation, the sourcing style and references are in accordance with guidelines.
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Nominator has been the primary editor for most of 2020
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Well done. Extremely interesting article. — Maile (talk) 15:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- Maile: Thank you! Yoninah (talk) 16:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)