Talk:Jane Frizzle

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jane Frizzle article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

North East England Low‑importance

	North East England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject North East England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of North East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.North East EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject North East EnglandTemplate:WikiProject North East EnglandNorth East England articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Occult Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occult, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the occult on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OccultWikipedia:WikiProject OccultTemplate:WikiProject OccultOccult articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page was proposed for deletion by Dirtlawyer1 (talk · contribs) on 31 December 2015 with the comment:
"Subject does not satisfy the notability criteria of WP:BIO, WP:GNG or any other applicable guideline."
It was contested by Andrew Davidson (talk · contribs) on 3 January 2016 with the comment:
No explanation given.

Discussion of notability vs. finding significant sources

This discussion was copied from User talk: Andrew Davidson:

Andrew, you may want to discuss the notability of Jane Frizzle with User:Andrew Gray, per our discussion @ User talk:Dirtlawyer1#Jane Frizzle. I requested the other Andrew's input regarding the subject's notability before PROD'ing it. My WP:BEFORE search suggested the subject would probably not satisfy the GNG criteria for inclusion, but if you believe otherwise and want to take a crack at finding the additional significant sources required to keep it, I will defer from nominating it for AfD review. Cheers. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:30, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Topics are best discussed at their talk pages, so that all editors may participate and see what is said. Andrew D. (talk) 23:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Andrew Davidson: Per your suggestion, I have copied the preceding discussion from your user talk page to this article talk page. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 23:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree with Dirtlawyer1's view. Several experienced editors have worked upon the article and seemed reasonably content with it. Andrew Gray was not one of them and so it's not clear why he was consulted. For my own part, I was born in this part of the country. I was not familiar with the topic but found it covered in several books and so may well expand upon it. But not now as I'm going to bed. Good night. Andrew D. (talk) 23:46, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]