This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2018. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Jane Balme is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
@LisaLodwick: could you comment on Jane Balme's notability? I can't find any coverage in reliable, independent, secondary sources as required by the general notability guideline, and based on Google Scholar citation counts she does not appear to be particularly highly cited within the field of Australian archaeology (if she were highly cited or otherwise demonstrated to be a significant researcher in her field, she would qualify for notability per WP:ACADEMIC. signed, Rosguilltalk22:57, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Rosguill: I have already cited a secondary source - Arthure, Susan (2014). "Balme, Jane". Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Springer. pp. 740–741, which is a reliable independent publication. This article describes Balme as a "leading researcher in the archaeology of Indigenous Australia", and summarises her major research contributions. Following the notability criteria for academics Wikipedia:Notability (academics) this shows Balme has had a significant impact on her scholarly discipline.
Balme does not have a Google Scholar profile, but many of her articles are highly cited within archaeology, such as Balme 2000 Australian Archaeology, and Balme et al 2009 Quaternary International. LLodwick 17:09, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
@Rosguill:@LisaLodwick: Balme is highly cited in her discipline and is e.g., secretary and chair of the Australian National Committee for Archaeology Teaching and Learning and on the Science Advisory Committee of the Kimberley Foundation Australia. There's an independent encyclopedia source confirming her notability, she has a good publication record and sits on an advisory committee to a national level body associated with her field. Struggling to see why she doesn't fit the criteria tbh.
As a aside remember that Google Scholar is not great for assessing humanities disciplines and those which aren't on, e.g., Pubmed or Cambridge Scientific. Few citations for scholars who are in the disciplines Google Scholar is weak on, is simply absence of evidence. This case provides a good example of that.
.jpg){kind=small}
.svg){kind=logo}
