Talk:Jan Veizer

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Climate change Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Climate change, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Climate change on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Climate changeWikipedia:WikiProject Climate changeTemplate:WikiProject Climate changeClimate change
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
If you are looking for ways to improve this article, we recommend checking out our recommended sources and our style guide

Physics: Biographies Low‑importance

	Physics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysicsWikipedia:WikiProject PhysicsTemplate:WikiProject Physicsphysics
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Biographies Taskforce.

Geology Low‑importance

	Geology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Jan Veizer be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Untitled

I think that to be 'disputed', a work needs to be disputed in a reputable journal, not a blog.65.12.145.148 23:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That he has researched global warming (ie. the current warming period) is not in a reputed journal either. His research is on the million year scale - not on the century to decadal. Realclimate is covered specifically under the exceptions noted in WP:SPS, they are climate scientists and they are writing within their context of their expertise. --Kim D. Petersen 02:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A blog is still a blog though. It isn't like that blog is subject to any independent criticism. The RC people are entitled to their opinion but it is still a blog. --Surgical Stryke (talk) 04:19, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RC is accepted as a WP:RS. You can try to overturn that, but you won't do it by edit warring on this page William M. Connolley (talk) 08:44, 14 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RC is still a blog and an intensely partisan one at that. It certainly isn't reputable, as User:65.12.145.148 requested. If there is reputable dispute out there, it should be available somewhere other than RC, don't you think? --Surgical Stryke (talk) 02:02, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Contrary to your assertions, RC is considered a reliable source. Your personal views on whether its reputable or not, is rather irrelevant - but lets just say that both Science and Nature disagree with you. As for being partisan - thats an opinion, and also rather irrelevant. --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 07:57, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You mean irrelevant like the unsupported characterization of the number of people who express an opinion on Veizer's work? That sort of irrelevant? --Surgical Stryke (talk) 03:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

4.500

Considering the discussion style and some edit comments I just wonder what is happening here, it however mirrors the style of discussion on the upper level as well. Veizers record on palaeoclimate and isotopic reseach is impressive. Its exactly what brought him the Leibniz Prize. A major data base for any far reaching palaeoclimate study and in that respect as well an important base for validation of climate modelling, e.g. for retrofitting with ice ages and empiric determinations of climate sensitivity. Insofare the time scale point doesnt hit the bulls eye completely. --Polentario (talk) 04:51, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cosmic rays

The section about cosmic rays is clearly written by person(s) advocating Veizer's theories. Could someone make this more npov please? --Sarefo (talk) 17:53, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have given it a shot, but you're right, much work remains to be done. Jinkinson talk to me 04:27, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look here, his "theories" use up a large amount of the page on paleoclimatology ..., discussion https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Paleoclimatology#Controlling_Factors Prokaryotes (talk) 17:34, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the section. Prokaryotes (talk) 15:27, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BLP noticeboard

~~Section = 109 BLP articles labelled "Climate Change Deniers" all at once.~~ This article was placed in a "climate change deniers" category. After discussion on WP:BLPN and WP:CFD the category was deleted. Peter Gulutzan (talk) 19:43, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jan Veizer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jan Veizer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817202651/http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~veizer/default.html to http://www.science.uottawa.ca/~veizer/default.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:14, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]