Jump to content

Talk:Jan Crawford

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Jan Crawford Greenburg)

Jan Crawford Greenburg "Supreme Conflict" discussion with Choper, Varat, Kmiec, Starr

[edit]

February 1, 2007 Ms. Greenburg was on campus at Pepperdine University School of Law as part of her book tour promoting Supreme Conflict. She participated in a discussion with Supreme Court scholars:

Jesse H. Choper, Earl Warren Professor of Public Law, University of California, Berkeley (Boalt Hall)

Douglas W. Kmiec, Caruso Family Chair and Professor of Constitutional Law, Pepperdine University

Kenneth W. Starr, Duane and Kelly Roberts Dean and Professor of Law

Jonathan D. Varat, Professor of Law and Former Dean, UCLA

Video of this discussion is available at: http://law.pepperdine.edu/symposia/greenburg.jsp —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 137.159.9.20 (talk) 05:17, 3 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

'Controversies' section removal

[edit]

I have removed the "controversies" section introduced on 9 January, on the basis that it was substantially flawed and inappropriate for Wikipedia.

  • The section was poorly sourced, relying on a single source to justify the existence of a "controversy". A search for reporting on the existence of such a "controversy" turns up no other results other than a handful of blogs and websites, most of which are dedicated to Ron Paul himself.
  • It speaks of "many commentators" without identifying such commentators, which is a weasel word preventing verification of the reliability and suitability of these purported "commentators".
  • It adopts a non-impartial perspective and tone, opening with a slanted expression of doubt ("failed to accurately report"), describing the omission as "puzzling" and "unscrupulous" (which in turn necessarily suggests - without citation - that the action in question was intentional), and speaking of "misfeasance" (a term that specifically refers to the unlawful or improper execution of a lawful action and is potentially defamatory when used inappropriately).
  • This has the overall effect of turning the section into an editorial, in which motives are improperly assumed and conclusions drawn that are not supported by the provided evidence or in compliance with Wikipedia policy.

These issues, moreover, are highlighted by the fact that the section title chosen by one of the most substantial contributors to that section was "Lack of creditably [sic] as a journalist", which is clearly not in line with Wikipedia policy or guidelines. The fact that ths section title was subsequently change does not bring the therein-contained content into compliance with said policies. The above issues would be problematic regardless of the content of the article, but editors should also note that they "must take particular care when adding information about living persons", in accordance with Wikipedia policy on biographies of living persons. Cyril Washbrook (talk) 08:18, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree. Biographies about news reporters/commentators routinely include "controversy" or similar-titled sections. See Glenn Beck, Rachel Maddow, Rush Limbaugh, and so on. Also the articles on FOX News, MSNBC, et cetera. Your claim that it is inappropriate ignores the fact is is standard practice on wikipedia.
The section needs to be REWRITTEN, not censored. So "be bold" and rewrite it to remove any objections you may have. ---- Theaveng (talk) 16:41, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jan Crawford makes shift to biased reporting in favor of Romney

[edit]

In a June 1, 2012 interview segment with Charlie Rose hosting, Ms Crawford launched her career in a new direction as a surrogate of Mitt Romney. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikipietime (talk • contribs) 15:58, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Jan Crawford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 03:25, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jan Crawford. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jan_Crawford&oldid=1257627506"