Talk:Jameson's mamba

Jameson's mamba is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on December 16, 2021.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 20, 2021	Good article nominee	Listed
September 25, 2021	Featured article candidate	Promoted

Current status: Featured article

Amphibians and Reptiles Mid‑importance

	Jameson's mamba is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Africa Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Jameson's mamba/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dracophyllum (talk · contribs) 08:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to do this review :) Draco phyllum 08:15, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Review

Some notes to start:

a) Specific name > specific epithet

done - I used to do this initially but some reviewers found "epithet" too jargony...still can be argued that epithet is more exacting in meaning than name Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

b) "and generally uncorrected by subsequent authors." is this in one of the refs?

Yes. Brongersma (1936) points that out. I added a note to help for future reference. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:23, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

c) "pointed the correct spelling" > corrected the spelling to

done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

d) ref 7 could me expanded a bit

I expanded journal name - not sure what else can be done Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 10:42, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

e) the image doesn't have a caption

added Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:31, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

f) subcaudal > wiktionary linked

linked at first instance to WP page - generally only use Wikt when WP lacking~~

g) can we get a phylogeny? I can make it for you if you want.

that would be great! Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 11:39, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Draco phyllum 01:05, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

h) "The general consensus is" is this reffed?

Yes - FN 11 reports that most authorities regard sexes as roughly equal in size but the field research in Nigeria found otherwise Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

i) "The number and pattern of scales on a snake's body are a key element of identification to species level" > The number and pattern of scales on a snake's body play a key role in the identification and differentiation at the species level.

Sure, why not....changed Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

j) link sedentary

linked Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

k) anod ??

typo - fixed Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

l) breeding sec > one para

oops - fixed Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

m) link cisticolas

linked Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

n) SubSaharan > Sub-Saharan

oops - fixed Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:41, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

a) Earwig is clean when you take into account that the 95% similarity websites are just copying wp.

b) I don't really have any more suggestions, so will probably pass this in a sec Draco phyllum 23:46, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

c) Final comment: Article meets GA criteria - well done cas! Draco phyllum 00:30, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

predators

If any study has shown that the species of birds which hunt these snakes are resistant to its venom, please add to the article - that would be of great interest. 50.111.6.149 (talk) 12:32, 16 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Are those birds resistant or do their feathers protect them from the snake's fangs?

Wikifan153 (talk) 05:23, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Black Mamba Snake About Script

I want Balck mamba About 125.27.156.69 (talk) 18:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See Black mamba. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alberta691 (talk • contribs) 11:08, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]