Jump to content

Talk:James Wharton, Baron Wharton of Yarm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Controversy

[edit]

I can't see how the Private Members Bill section is NOT controversial within James's constituency. Not for the fact it is about the EU, but for the fact he chose a national, rather than local issue. The section is referenced, and yet keeps being moved by anonymous IP addresses. Can I suggest we leave it where it is, and registered users discuss here if it should be moved elsewhere. Andrew (talk) 16:20, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The anonymous edits are getting annoying, yes. I've given it a thorough clean up, I hope. I think wherever we put the PMB, the explanation and criticism should come together (i.e. the latter immediately after), since having the explanation in the career section and the criticism in a controversies section makes the issue difficult to follow. A casual reader might also accidentally think that they relate to two different issues. Also, as I've said in my edit label, the controversies section was getting far too large, soon to overtake the career section. This is misleading as it suggests that James is a highly controversial MP, which, especially since he has only been in office for 3 years, isn't accurate. Thanks for your hard work here, Andrew. BlackHairDurham (talk) 00:23, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with BlackHairDurham (talk) edits. The controversy section was too large. A general clean up and removal of biased language and half-stories (especially surrounding Sri Lanka) was necessary. Scouserjack (talk) 00:32, 4 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Wharton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:07, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:52, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]