Talk:James Rivington

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the James Rivington article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Journalism Mid‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Biography / Intelligence / North America / United States / Early Modern / American Revolution C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	Intelligence task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)
	American Revolutionary War task force

Untitled

There is not enough evidence to claim the James Rivington was supplying information to George Washington. The "evidence" for such a claim is a tenuous reference in one of Washington's letters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.226.16.50 (talk) 23:19, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, one of the source links, a paper by Kara Pierce, does not link to the specified material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.226.16.50 (talk) 23:24, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article is an exact copy of http://www . famousamericans . net/jamesrivington/ (I had to mess with the URL because apparently this is a blacklisted URL for wikipedia) It should be changed but I don't know enough about James Rivington to know where to begin. I just found a biography that has some sources at http://www.binghamton.edu/history/resources/bjoh/A%20Revolutionary%20Masquerade%20The%20Chronicles%20of%20James%20Rivington.htm Maybe someone who knows a little more can take it from there. Michael.passman (talk) 03:33, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thoroughly revised from better sources.--Wetman (talk) 06:57, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]