Talk:James Kirkham Ramsbottom

James Kirkham Ramsbottom has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 17, 2024. (Reviewed version).

A fact from James Kirkham Ramsbottom appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 February 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that during World War I, James Kirkham Ramsbottom saved the British daffodil industry?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James Kirkham Ramsbottom.

Wikipedia

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during the "The 20,000 Challenge: UK and Ireland", which started on 20 August 2016 and is still open. You can help!

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 00:47, 26 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that during the First World War James Kirkham Ramsbottom saved the British daffodil industry? Source: "James Kirkham Ramsbottom began his study of eelworm at Wisley in 1916 and within two years devised the hot-water cure - just in time to save the young industry from destruction" from: Tompsett, Andrew (2006). Golden Harvest: The Story of Daffodil Growing in Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly. Alison Hodge Publishers. p. 70. ISBN 978-0-906720-46-2. "if not for the hot water treatment (HWT) developed by James Kirkham Ramsbottom the narcissus bulb industry would have collapsed altogether" from: Daffodils. Royal Horticultural Society. 1981. p. 37. ISBN 978-0-906603-19-2. and "James Kirkham Ramsbottom (1891-1925), an unsung hero, discovered that heat treatment was effective against narcissus eelworm, thereby saving the British daffodil industry from disaster" from: Biggs, Matthew (6 May 2019). RHS A Nation in Bloom: Celebrating the People, Plants and Places of the Royal Horticultural Society. White Lion Publishing. p. 103. ISBN 978-0-7112-3935-7.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Nilofer Khan

Moved to mainspace by Dumelow (talk). Self-nominated at 19:35, 21 January 2023 (UTC).[reply]

Starting review. Zeete (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Review: New (moved to main space January 21), long enough (6,960 per DYK check), cited, neutral, Earwig reported Violation Unlikely (34.6%, due to long quotations), QPQ done, hook interesting, length checked ok. Very interesting article. Consider using Template:sfn for the subsequent Tompsett refs. Consider adding a link and paragraph in Narcissus and Ditylenchus dipsaci.

Good to go. Thanks, Zeete (talk) 15:19, 24 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Matthew Yeager (talk) 04:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:James Kirkham Ramsbottom/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Dumelow (talk · contribs) 10:36, 3 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Matthew Yeager (talk · contribs) 04:19, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

Straightforward! Thanks for bringing this over the goal line. Thanks to all the editors that made this an easy nomination.

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
Easy to follow, well summarized, and referenced well.
It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Checked references, book searches, and CopyVios
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.