Talk:James Gillogly

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Cryptography: Computer science

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Beale

Gillogly strings do not 'debunk' Beale. They raise questions about the nature of the Ciphers. That's it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 47.142.15.116 (talk) 18:26, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Best cryptanalyst

We say:

"On the PBS website, they report that he has been called "arguably the best non-government cryptanalyst in the U.S."

However, on the PBS website the quote is not attributed. Moreover -- and with all respect to Gillogly -- the assertion is almost certainly false, given all the very smart folk involved in academic crypto research in the US. It's a little like comparing apples to oranges, too, as (AFAIK) Gillogly does work on solving classical/machine crypto, as opposed to modern cryptography. — Matt Crypto 14:42, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point. I do think it's appropriate though that a mention be made of just how well-known he is. How about the wording, "He is currently considered to be one of the best non-government cryptanalysts in the United States"? That way we have "one of the" instead of "the", and we can still link to the PBS site as reference. Elonka 15:20, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The PBS Nova article is more specific than this: '..."arguably the best non-government cryptanalyst in the U.S." in the field of classical (historical) cryptosystems.' This may well still be false, but it addresses and doesn't conflict with your point. User:Scryer 11 Sep 2006

External links

Many of the links to older articles are dead (Cryptologia, The Daily Telegraph). Are there long-term-archived copies anywhere that could be linked to instead? (Anders Hallström) 85.230.255.48 (talk) 13:57, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James Gillogly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060126085231/http://members.fortunecity.com/jpeschel/gillog3.htm to http://members.fortunecity.com/jpeschel/gillog3.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:24, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on James Gillogly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://members.fortunecity.com/jpeschel/gillog3.htm
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090207192848/http://members.fortunecity.com/jpeschel/gillog1.htm to http://members.fortunecity.com/jpeschel/gillog1.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:55, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]