This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article was copy edited by a member of the Guild of Copy Editors.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles
I attempted to approximately demarcate the appropriate sections for the article, and added information about his personal life (I used the 'citation needed' template because I wasn't sure the references I found were the best ones, they can be found here and here). Far be it for me to criticize the Encyclopedia Britannica, but the article suffers from clunky, obscure, obtuse, and sometimes even POV wording that should be made more concise. Eliz8116:59, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I quote: "Although an outstanding student he did not win any prizes, mainly because he was uninterested in mathematics or classics, which formed the basis of the course." - Erm...a (presumably unintentionally hilarious) contradiction surely? Perhaps the word 'intellect' would be a little more appropriate than 'student'?Johnpretty010 (talk) 21:46, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I had a look at the online public-domain 1911 edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica (Vol 25, p.883), linked above by Eliz81, and this is what it says: "Notwithstanding exceptional vigour in mind and body, he did not attain any of the usual scholastic or athletic distinctions. The only studies then seriously prosecuted in the university course were mathematics and classics. Neither of these attracted him in their academical forms, nor did he care for competitive sport." I wouldn't want pompous prose like that in the article, but it's somewhat different from Eliz81 (or whoever)'s paraphrase. I don't think that mathematics and classics "formed the basis of the course" (it would be a rather bizarre course, it seems to me). How about substituting something like "His intellect was highly regarded, but he was not interested in either mathematics or classics, the only subjects that were taken seriously at the time", which might give a better result. --GuillaumeTell16:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To modern ears a university course concentrating on the classics and mathematics may sound bizarre, but that was probably the case at Cambridge in his time. Cambridge has been noted for mathematics for centuries. I don't know if details of the BA course in his time are readily available, but for comparison there are detailed syllabuses of the course at Trinity College Dublin at about the same time in two histories which are available online. They make it clear that the main compulsory subjects were the Latin and Greek classics, together with theology (concentrating on the Greek bible) and also a different science subject in each of the four years. Just what a schoolmaster or aspiring clergyman would have needed, in the days before modern languages (or even English) were taught. The balance at Cambridge may have been different. NRPanikker (talk) 18:26, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
To give a bit more of context, until the second part of the 19th century the only two Tripos in existence were Mathematics and Classics (one could read Law, but it was not a Tripos and was considered an easy way for stupid gentlemen to obtain the requisite degree for ordination in the Church of England). Accordingly almost all the prizes and fellowships at that time were in either Maths or Classics, and someone without interest in either would not do very well. A generation later F. W. Maitland encountered the same problem, although a Moral Philosophy tripos had been introduced in the meantime. Atchom (talk) 22:54, 19 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
