Talk:Jake La Botz

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 November 2006. The result of the discussion was Keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians.

Illinois Low‑importance

	Illinois portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Illinois, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IllinoisWikipedia:WikiProject IllinoisTemplate:WikiProject IllinoisWikiProject Illinois articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Chicago

	Chicago portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles or pages related to Chicago or the Chicago metropolitan area.ChicagoWikipedia:WikiProject ChicagoTemplate:WikiProject ChicagoChicago articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Here are some links to recent newspaper feature articles verifying the importance of Jake La Botz:

Boston Herald: theedge.bostonherald.com/musicNews/view.bg?articleid=162955

Los Angeles Times: www.calendarlive.com/music/cl-wk-popb5oct05,0,2794730.story?coll=cl-music-features

Pollstar: www.pollstar.com/news/viewnews.pl?NewsID=7311

Nasville City Paper: www.nashvillecitypaper.com/index.cfm?section_id=12&screen=news&news_id=52898

Harrisburg Patriot News: www.pennlive.com/news/patriotnews/index.ssf?/base/columnists/1160667603275760.xml&coll=1#continue

Salt Lake City Deseret News: deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,650201911,00.html

Pasadena Weekly: www.pasadenaweekly.com/article.php?id=3999&IssueNum=44 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.231.91.219 (talk) 03:58, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jake La Botz.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Jake La Botz.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Jake La Botz.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of Early Life Information

Cited information on the early life of La Botz, specifically regarding dropping out of high school and attending college, has been deleted a few times from the page. It contains a citation, and I can see no reason why it should need to be removed. No explanation is given with the edits. If anyone could provide a rationale regarding removal before the content is altered again, that would be helpful. BU Rob13 (talk) 03:35, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]