Talk:Jaguares F.C.

Football Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mexico Low‑importance

	Mexico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Merge

Though Jaguares de Chiapas officialy dissappeared a month ago and the franchise was bought by Querétaro, the new Chiapas F.C. (which was previously San Luis has been renamed as Jaguares de Chiapas, in a search for mantaining the identity of the "dissappeared" team. If there aren't two Querétaro F.C. pages (for old and the new) why there are two Chiapas pages (Jaguares and F.C.) ? ProofR (talk) 14:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The articles should be merged but it should still be called Chiapas F.C. since Jaguares is the nickname of the team. The team is officially known as Chiapas F.C.GoPurple 'n Gold₂₄ 23:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Chiapas F.C. is the former football club from San Luis and has inherited San Luis' place in the relegation table. Accordingly, I think it is misleading to state that this club was formerly known as Jaguares de Chiapas (that club moved to Querétaro and is now known as Club Querétaro). The managerial and other history for this page really ought to reflect that of San Luis prior to Apertura 2013, should it not? Jogurney (talk) 17:50, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is really confusing, to the average fan it's even more confusing. What ever should be done should be done. I added "formerly known as Club de Fútbol Jaguares de Chiapas" only because that's how it's stated in the spanish article but I it's confusing. I think this is similar to the Rangers F.C.. The current Rangers franchise is not the original one, I believe but the article has all the history of the former Rangers franchise. GoPurple 'n Gold₂₄ 05:04, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Also on the club's website they have the old Jaguares franchise history. http://www.chiapasfc.com/contenidos/historia_club GoPurple 'n Gold₂₄ 05:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Potential Vanadlism

I noticed that the "Current Squad" section today included many players from AC Milan with Neymar added in. I do not believe this is the team's real roster, so I inserted an older version which appears to have the real roster. If I have made a mistake, let me know.

Infinity Project (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2014 (UTC) Infinity Project[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Chiapas F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]