Jump to content

Talk:Jagdgeschwader 11/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria[reply]


This article never should have been promoted to B-class. Many paragraphs needs cites, page numbers often do not support the fact that they are supposed to reference, badly needs a copy-edit, etc.

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    see above
    B. MoS compliance:
    References need publishing locations, lede too short
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    Page 80 of Caldwell and Muller only references initial formation and locations, but is cited nearly a dozen times.
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    No discussion of poorly-trained pilots arriving in 1944 or of tactics used to offset Allied numbers, if any. No examples of numbers available vs. opposition's numbers
    B. Focused:
    Insufficient discussion of JG 11's operations in the context of the Air Defense of the Reich. No apparent use of Prien's definitive history of JG 1 and 11. No use of the relevant volumes of Prien's Der Jagdfliegerverbände der Luftwaffe.
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail: