Talk:Jadran (training ship)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Tomobe03 (talk · contribs) 10:54, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

Should ...in 1984 undertook her first long-distance cruise for two decades say in two decades? Not sure about this though.

In She had a displacement of 720-long-ton (810-short-ton),... I believe adj= parameter was left on in error, i.e. shouldn't this be 720 long tons...?

Should ...on the Mediterranean... be in the Mediterranean? Not entirely sure, but I thought it should be in this context.

Gruž near Dubrovnik implies Gruž is not in Dubrovnik while it is a part of the city containing its modern-day port (and was within the then tram network). It is about 2km outside the walled city - could this be the source of the "near Dubrovnik"?

According to this [1] Đivo Bašić article, Jadran was towed from Venice to Šibenik in December 1946 before it was towed to Tivat. Šibenik had a repair shipyard at the time, so this makes sense if urgent repairs were thought to be needed. Unfortunately the article does not say how long Jadran stayed there.

Added source and info (nice find BTW, I always struggle with Google search in Serbo-Croatian). Will add more from that article before Milhist ACR. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

After reading the article, I could not think of an unanswered question except one: Readers might be interested to know on what grounds is Croatia demanding the ship. According to this [2] the Croatian claim is based on the fact that the ship was based in Split.

Portsmouth is linked twice - once in World War II and once in Rump Yugoslavia and Montenegro

Sources appear to be reliable and prose properly sourced
Information presented in the lede and the infobox is sourced in the prose and properly summarised
Images have suitable captions and licences and are appropriate for the topic
Article appears neutral, failry broad and sufficiently focused
There are no edit-wars going on concerning this article

Very nice work overall. Just few things to tackle IMO. Placing on hold.--Tomobe03 (talk) 11:14, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

All good, Tomobe03. Thanks for the review and for finding the two sources! Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:08, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]