Talk:Jackson–Vanik amendment

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine

Update needed?

Congress upgrades trade status with Ukraine: Repeals Cold War era restrictions

Jews considered religious or national minority in Russia?

I've read that Jews have traditionally been considered a national rather than religious minority in Russia, thus the wording of the first sentence would seem to be slightly misleading: "…emigration, especially of refuseniks, Jews, and other religious minorities." (in terms of the word "other")

Perhaps someone with more expertise could comment? Historian932 (talk) 00:38, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is correct. 178.177.98.152 (talk) 20:18, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Contradictory sentence

I find this sentence, in the section pertaining to effects of J-V, to be rather odd: "The number of exit visas declined after the passing of the amendment, as the USSR felt the external pressure was harming its credibility." If the Soviet Union felt that the pressure was "harming its credibility," then it makes no sense that their response to the amendment was to deny exit visas increasingly.

So there are two outcomes possible:

1) The Soviets increased the number of exit visas because their credibility was being harmed internationally (due to the J-V amendment, among other things). 2) The Soviets decreased the number of exit visas despite the fact that their credibility was being harmed internationally.

But the sentence as it stands is illogical. Isoruku (talk) 16:15, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed; also tagged as unreferenced section .-M.Altenmann >t 16:45, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Post Soviet times

The article misses a coherent explanation how the amendment was acting after the dissolution of the Soviet Union. -M.Altenmann >t 17:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jackson–Vanik amendment. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://archive.is/20130703232122/http://www.cjp.org/page.aspx?id=195969 to http://www.cjp.org/page.aspx?id=195969

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:35, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]