Jump to content

Talk:Jacksdale

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Claim to fame

[edit]

A previous editor (81.149.144.162) had inserted "The following maybe speculatory" before the Claim to fame section. I've know idea if this claim (or the information it disputes) is valid, but I felt that as opinion it belonged on the Talk page, not in the article. Perhaps somebody with local knowledge could verify the "Claim to fame" info and edit as necessary. Dave.Dunford 14:58, 9 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Population

[edit]

The population of Jacksdale is definitely not 114,200 and there are not 46,200 households. I suspect that these numbers are for the district of Ashfield not for Jacksdale. This needs clarification. Tina Cordon (talk)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jacksdale. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:44, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]